10 Dec Rear Window (1954)

Copernican Cinema

I just don’t like Hitchcock. I admit that he ‘delivered value’ in his day, but as I review his films today, I find them trite, badly dated. The style of acting he used now looks ’actorly.’ His camera framing is well considered but unimaginative by today’s standards. The stories are not engaging (to me).

But this film really is a classic. Not because of the acting or the dialog, but because it was so cleverly conceived. And because the execution is so purely cinematic.

The first problem a writer/director faces is what stance the camera takes. Is it a fairly static ‘audience’ as if you were watching a play? Is it godlike in always seeing things from the best perspective, though sometimes humanly impossible? Is it a character? Or does it follow a character sometime showing their point of view, sometimes their reaction? Does it act?

Do we admit the camera exists — by introducing jiggle, or showing operator’s functions like focusing, developing? Do we dissolve the camera’s perspective by juggling time or perspectives? Do we try a ‘100 simultaneous cameras’ approach?

Hitchcock usually uses the static theatrical approach — way too much for modern tastes. He punctuates this by sometimes doing a character focused shot, and sometimes a spectacular-for-the-time godshot — as in the ‘Psycho’ shower scene.

But this film is more purely conceived for the camera. There are no godshots. Nearly all the camerawork is from Jeff’s eye, or of Jeff’s apartment, with a few notable exceptions. What is novel is why this works — the set and entire story were composed backwards. That is, instead of having some slice of life that the camera discovers, this reality exists as if it were created by the camera before the action starts. Everything that is required to motivate the world is comprehensible from that apartment — the entire physics of this world is based on its center.

In other words, Hitchcock’s achievement here is not how he accommodates the camera to the world, but the world to the camera.

Pure genius.

Posted in 2001

Ted’s Evaluation — 4 of 3: Every cineliterate person should experience this.

IMDB